Are You Still Human after You’re Dead?
We don’t refer to people with the pronoun “it.” “It” is strictly for inanimate objects. So what do you think they should use for the pronoun in these sentences?
When the 5,300-year-old mummy of Ötzi the Iceman was found 30 years ago, researchers found 61 tattoos on it.
That’s the summary of the article in the newsletter The Conversation.
Here’s a sentence in the article:
Ötzi the Iceman remained hidden to the world for millennia until two German tourists discovered it 30 years ago in a glacier in the Italian Alps.
https://theconversation.com/what-otzi-the-prehistoric-iceman-can-teach-us-about-the-use-of-tattoos-in-ceremonial-healing-or-religious-rites-168058
Since this pronoun occurs twice, we have a deliberate choice here, not a goof.
Let’s add to the confusion. this sentence also appears in that article:
Ötzi also sported tattoos on his chest.
So. Would you ever refer to a deceased relative with “it”? What do you think about this editorial decision in the article?
Here’s a picture of his/its statue:
Subscribe to this blog's RSS feed
Sigh. Another Redundancy
My experience with small town newspapers tells me that they have a lot of weakness in their proofreading and copy editing departments. Redundancy is a pretty common error.
Redundancy is when you repeat yourself unnecessarily. Here’s today’s example:
In order to provide the building with some tender loving care, Magin enlisted the help of Jackson, Wyoming, business MD Roofing to help tackle some of the work that needed to be put into the house to restore it back to its original state.
“Restore it” is enough. you don’t need “back.”
While I’m being a curmudgeon, I’ll mention that the first two words (“In order”) aren’t necessary, and although the “it” after “restore” is grammatically correct, a noun (the house) is better than a pronoun.
Harrumpf.
Oh. A picture of the place:
Another Diatribe Against Pronouns
I’ve mentioned this topic before. Use the search box to find more.
Don’t use pronouns if you can help it because you might face antecedent confusion. Like this funny:
Another Subjunctive Lesson
I picked this up on Memorial Day, hence the topic. But it’s a good example of not using the subjunctive when you’re supposed to.
The “if” makes the sentence contrary to reality, so you should use the subjunctive form of the verb, “were.” If only it were this easy.
Speaking as a pedant, using a pronoun (it) is frequently bad writing, even when using a pronoun is grammatical. What would you supply in place of the “it”?
Grammar Pun
Not even a lesson with it. Guess I’m being lazy.
Maybe I’ll do something worthwhile next time…