This is a really long sentence, so I made the parallel words bold.
The sentence is also from two months ago, so the politics is out of date, and I always tell you to ignore the politics anyway; this is a blog about writing and grammar.
Okay, now to the grammar. The rule is that parallel constructions should have the same form. See what the writer did here?
Sounds funny when I point out the crooked parallelism, doesn’t it? The second verb should be “jeopardize” to match “would delay. (You can assume a “would” before “jeopardize.”)
Discover five critical techniques for good writing, no charge. These are foundational to my philosophy of writing. Drop me a line at curmudgeon@writing-rag.com asking for the article, and I'll send it to you.
I don't get enough traffic to justify using an auto-responder, so you'll get the article directly from me.
I happen to have another article with some good tips. I'll send you both.
Bio
Rogers George has been a technical writer for more than 20 years. He has written on subjects as diverse as outhouse assembly, restaurant reviews, software, information security, and scientific equipment. He has his own writing consultancy and is always happy to discuss writing and grammar. Drop him a line at curmudgeon@writing-rag.com.
Leave a Reply