I happen to think the five-day-a-week online newsletter A Word A Day is pretty interesting. I recommend you subscribe. At the beginning of every week, Anu Garg (and his team) post a little essay describing the theme for the week’s words. Here’s what he posted recently:
To dehumidify is the opposite of humidify, but to devote is not the opposite of vote. To take is the antonym of to give, but caretaker and caregiver are synonyms. We add -er and -est to a word to make its comparative and superlative, but temper and tempest are not the comparative and superlative of temp.
English language learners around the world: you have my sympathy. I believe the language was designed as a secret handshake. Wouldn’t want everyone to learn the code so easily!
This week I have picked five random words from the code book of this language. Five* down, 999,995 more to go. Don’t let this discourage you. Google is working on the Enigma machine to break the code.
*Or 5000, if you have been with us since the beginning in 1994
Go to http://wordsmith.org/awad/subscribe.html to subscribe. You’ll be glad you did.
Subscribe to this blog's RSS feed
I’m still in vacation mode, so here’s a link to a list of solecisms posted by Steven Pinker, who teaches at Harvard. Pinker’s a good guy, but I confess I’ve never run into some of these goofs; perhaps I don’t hang around with Harvard types enough.
So it looks like I took New Year’s Day off! Maybe I’ll switch to even-numbered-day posts this year.
To my mathematician friends, 2017 is a prime, by the way.
I ran into a quote from Isaac Asimov, whose birthday is today, January 2.
A poor idea well written is more likely to be accepted than a good idea poorly written. -Isaac Asimov, scientist and writer (2 Jan 1920-1992)
To which I respond,
Just think what you get when you have a good idea and it’s well written.
That’s what this site is about, though the ideas themselves are your responsibility.
I hope The Writing Rag is a good example to follow.
An editorial datelined Dec 19 in The Washington Post had this headline:
Should the electoral college stop a Trump presidency? Depends whom you ask.
Good for them—they got “whom” right! I don’t particularly care what the article says (in fact I didn’t read it), but they got their English right! woo hoo!
Okay, while I’m praising people, here’s one about a kid who still believes in Santa Claus. He got both your and you’re right. Third cell:
I suppose he could say he’s as good as The Washington Post.
I’ve written about this before, but hey, I have a comic!
Everybody knows about the TV show (or was it a movie?) that started with something about “to boldly go where…” and you probably had an English teacher (if you’re old enough) who said not to do that, you should say “boldly to go…” or maybe “to go boldly.” You might remember that I said that this rule was promulgated by Latinists who wanted English to be more like Latin. Baloney! Put those adverbs right there in the middle of the verb! (If you’re going to use an adverb, anyway. Try your sentence with a better verb and no adverb.)
So here’s the comic. See the second cell:
Thank you, Scott. I’ve been hanging onto this comic since 2014 and only now got around to finally using it. Shame on me.
By the way, at the top of that second cell, he writes, “have only noticed…” a similar construction.