Another Whom Post

rogersgeorge on January 28th, 2017

Just because I think it’s funny. Thanks, Scott.

Remember (I hope) “whom” is for whenever you need it as the object of a preposition or the subject of an infinitive. Even if it’s the first word in a Question! Harrumpf.

Subscribe to this blog's RSS feed

Another Correct Usage

rogersgeorge on January 26th, 2017

Good old New Yorker. They pretty much always get their language right, and they’re famous for it. Here’s a usage that I think is fading away, even though I like it. It appeals to the detail-lover in me. It’s the punctuation mark called, in English, the dieresis.

Often when two vowels occur together, we either pronounce only one of them (when two vowels go walking, the first one does the talking) such as the word “boat.” Sometimes they are combined to form a diphthong, such as height. We’re so used to it we often don’t hear it. I’ll help you hear it. The word “hi” is pronounced the same as the karate term, “hai!” Whatever happens, the vowels usually combine into one syllable.

But sometimes, especially with prefixes, you end up with two vowels together, but each in its own syllable, and that’s where the dieresis comes in. If you want the second vowel to be in its own syllable the correct thing to do is use a dieresis. So here’s our example:

The reëlection of Barack Obama was a boon for the prepping industry.

Lots of folks, who don’t know how to create a dieresis, use a hyphen, re-elect. That’s okay, I guess, but why not be high class and use a dieresis? I googled “ascii for dieresis” to save you looking them up:

vowels with diaresis
ä          alt + 132
ë          alt + 137
ï           alt + 139
ö          alt + 148
ü          alt + 129

Hold down the Alt key and type the numbers on the numeric keypad. Reïgnite your inner grammarian!

A Pair of Almost-Synonyms

rogersgeorge on January 18th, 2017

Darren Bell posts the occasional Candorville strip of the main character, Lemont, (who is a writer) correcting someone’s grammar. I have long held the opinion about the difference between “continual” and “continuous” expressed in this comic. It’s nice to see my opinion confirmed.

Circumlocutions

rogersgeorge on December 21st, 2016

Yes, circumlocution is an actual word. It means “a phrase when you can’t think of (or don’t want to use) a word that means the same thing.” You use a circumlocution when you say “beat around the bush” instead of “evasive.”

“Ultimate” normally means “cannot be exceeded,” but it also means “last,” and herein lies the following joke in Pros and Cons:

Pros & Cons - 12/16/2016

“Penultimate” means “next to last.” Did you know there’s a word for “the one before next to last”? It’s “antepenultimate.”

You probably won’t need to use “antepenultimate” often, but there you have it if you ever want to avoid the circumlocution.

PS: The rules for accenting verbs in Classical Greek go only as far as antepenultimate, so I had forgotten about this word, a good example of prefixes gone wild, preantepenultimate (fourth from the last), which I was reminded of recently in A word a Day.

Unconventional Contractions

rogersgeorge on December 19th, 2016

Apostrophes’ main use is for contractions, I think. More on that later.

Apostrophes are also used for quotes inside quotes; in fact, the rule is you alternate single and double quotes as you nest them.

The student told me, “Our teacher said ‘Don’t use the fire escape until I say “GO!”.’.”

Technically you don’t need spaces between the marks when they fall together, but I would have used them because I want you to be able to see clearly what I’m doing. But I lucked out because I need a period for each sentence.

Another use for apostrophes is to show possession. Technically that is also a contraction; the possessive used to be “-es,” and we took out the “e” and replaced it with an apostrophe.

Contractions. Perhaps the most common contraction is n’t for not, but you can use it to shorten verb forms, such as the present perfect: “could’ve” instead of “could have.” You can shorten the future, too: “we’ll” instead of “we will.”

Then sometimes jargon shortens words, and the correct way to show the shortening is with apostrophes, hence this Frazz:

Frazz

And I ran into this verb-form shortening with an uncommon, but perfectly correct contraction, brothers’ve:

Cul de Sac

Here are two rules:

In formal writing, avoid most contractions. Don’t use them unless they improve the writing.
Nowadays, most of the time, the –n’t contraction is okay to use.